The moderator tracking statistics are geared toward sites like Stack Overflow where lots of moderation is required. As a result, the automated email doesn't take into account actual moderating activity on a smaller site, such as this one. The primary thing our statistics look at is whether you've handled any flags since these are the exceptions moderators are tasked with handling. When a site doesn't have a lot of flags (Mathematics Educators has had 9 in the last month) we don't often have a way to tell if you are acting as a moderator or a regular user. We have no real way to measure other roles moderators take on such as site leadership and new user guidance.

We've been putting more thought into how we can monitor the health of low activity sites. One of the signals we are considering is moderator activity. If flags are being handled quickly, the site is probably not being overrun with spam and other nonsense. Over the lifetime of Mathematics Educators, flags are usually handled within a day and often within hours, so that's not a problem here. Looking at the recent self-evaluation, I don't have any concerns about quality either. As a team¹, you and quid are doing a great job here. So you can safely ignore the email for now.

For future reference, the following actions update the Last Activity date:

1. Handling comment flags
2. Handling moderator attention flags
3. Deleting posts
4. Closing posts
5. Deleting comments

Unfortunately reviews don't count unless you do one of those things along the way.

1. Typically we prefer three moderators, but since one of the original team stepped down we've only had two. I'd like to add another person, but there's no real urgency.

The moderator tracking statistics are geared toward sites like Stack Overflow where lots of moderation is required. As a result, the automated email doesn't take into account actual moderating activity on a smaller site, such as this one. The primary thing our statistics look at is whether you've handled any flags since these are the exceptions moderators are tasked with handling. When a site doesn't have a lot of flags (Mathematics Educators has had 9 in the last month) we don't often have a way to tell if you are acting as a moderator or a regular user. We have no real way to measure other roles moderators take on such as site leadership and new user guidance.

We've been putting more thought into how we can monitor the health of low activity sites. One of the signals we are considering is moderator activity. If flags are being handled quickly, the site is probably not being overrun with spam and other nonsense. Over the lifetime of Mathematics Educators, flags are usually handled within a day and often within hours, so that's not a problem here. Looking at the recent self-evaluation, I don't have any concerns about quality either. As a team¹, you and quid are doing a great job here. So you can safely ignore the email for now.

For future reference, the following actions update the Last Activity date:

1. Handling comment flags
2. Handling moderator attention flags
3. Deleting posts
4. Closing posts
5. Deleting comments

Unfortunately reviews don't count unless you do one of those things along the way.

1. Typically we prefer three moderators, but since one of the original team stepped down we've only had two. I'd like to add another person, but there's no real urgency.