Currently the off-topic closure reasons are:

  • This question is off-topic because it is a mathematical question as contrasted with a question about mathematics education. For a Stack Exchange site for mathematical questions please see Mathematics.
  • Migration.
  • Other.

I feel that there should be a more general closure reason available. If someone asks "Why do zebras have stripes instead of dots?", I don't want to vote to close the question because it is about mathematics but I don't want to write a custom reason every time something like this comes up. There are many types of (possible and existent) off-topic questions and it's unpractical to tailor a separate reason for everything. People (at least me) are often lazy and tend to select a template reason, and if there is no sufficiently general reason and people end up selecting inappropriate ones, the askers get confusing signals.

The closure reasons were previously discussed here, where the conclusion was to change the wording of the closure reason. The new closure reason is a good option, but I would strongly prefer to have a general off-topic reason as well. It is, of course, possible to close with a custom reason, but I find it inconvenient if this has to be done often.

I haven't cast a very large number of closing votes, but this problem has occurred several times already. What are your own experiences with closure reasons?

Of the three slots available for closing reasons, I think one should be reserved to be general enough. Could we make this change?

(I'm not sure if this should be a separate question or an answer to the linked one. I can move this one there if others prefer so.)

  • $\begingroup$ I will write something more detailed latter. Historically, it was "by accident" we do not have this (as I misunderstood the interface when changing). However, I then though about it and meanwhile I am quite convinced that having no general reason is better, for a small site at least. More specifically, I do not see how "I think it's better to have more general default closure reasons and to specify them with comments" is even different from using "other", using "other" one just writes the comment one would write anyway in the close-dialog . Could you please explain the difference you see? $\endgroup$
    – quid
    Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 9:46
  • $\begingroup$ @quid, you are right, there is no proper difference between giving a reason in comments and using the "other" reason. I'll edit. In my experience people (including myself) are often lazy and tend to select a default reason instead of writing a custom one. If there is no general reason for closing off-topic questions, this gives confusing signals to the askers. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2, 2015 at 10:13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think it would suffice to close with Other and paste something generic: This question appears not to fit with MESE guidelines as outlined in the Help Center's Asking page here. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 3, 2015 at 9:38

1 Answer 1


Let me recap the history. We used to have:

This question does not appear to be about teaching mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center.

Then, we added the "custom" one:

This question is off-topic because it is a mathematical question as contrasted with a question about mathematics education. For a Stack Exchange site for mathematical questions please see Mathematics.

This made the first one disappear. (Technically it is still there as so-called "default" reason, but it cannot be selected directly.) Originally, this was an oversight; I did not realize that the "default" one would disappear when adding a "custom" one. My first impulse was to add it back as "custom" one (which is basically what is proposed), but then I thought about it, and decided to let it like that for some time and now I am a lot happier without the first reason, here is why:

The "other" option covers it and it is better it is used instead. For the moment I see no reason for having a "general" reason. (Actually, I cannot imagine any circumstances for reinstating the "default"; if anything there should be something more specific.)

For those that do not vote (a lot) what does "other" offer:

It gives a box for writing an explanatory comment. The text "I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because " is already there, but one does not have to start like this and can write whatever comment.

Thus, what this does is that it somehow "forces" the first voter to write a comment. Later voters can select that reason directly, and this will auto-upvote the comment. When closure happens the "default" reason will be displayed, too.

Why this is useful:

  • When done in a reasonable way it gives more to the point information than a "general" closing message, and does so right away. If somebody intends to supplement the "general" vote by a comment (which is what was considered good practice before the new close-tools were available), then it is near-identical except that "other" is still better (see below).

  • The reasons used to close as "other" are tracked under the Close Stats accessible to users with access to moderation tools (that is 2k+ here, and 10k+ on graduated sites). Thus, when we use other for some time, we will get over time actual data on what type of "custom" reason we might need.

The in my opinion right way to think about the matter is. The standard way to close is via explaining the specific reason (that is using "other"), only for some standard-scenarios that occur frequently there is a prepared reason.

I do appreciate that voting via "other" is slightly more work. However, on this site we closed only a total of 7 questions over the last 30 days. So, about one question every four days. I thus think that streamlining the vote-to-close process is not really necessary.

Furthermore, as Benjamin Dickman remarks, there is no need to write lengthy explanations in clear cases. If somebody asks about zebras just complete "I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because " by "it is not about math education."

If over time it should turn out we get plenty of blatantly off-topic questions, then we can consider adding a "custom" reason for this. But at the moment we do not, so we deal with it in the standard way that is by "other."

There is another aspect, namely, that if one votes "other" one is exposed right away as voter, which one might want to avoid in some cases. However, with OPs that seem so problematic one might want to avoid direct interaction there is not rarely anyway still another option that fits ("unclear" or "opinion base" usually) or flag the post for moderators.

To sum this up: I think it is better we do not have a reason like:

This question does not appear to be about teaching mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center.

that merely says it is off-topic because it is not on-topic and can have as a side-effect not well-explained closures. Instead, please, use "other" and explain the specific reason.

If there are proposals for specific new "custom" reasons we can discuss about them. However, as long as we close only one question every three or four days, I do not really see the need either.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .