0
$\begingroup$

Does some textbook on probability use a particular way (described here) of accomplishing the segue into continuous distributions?

The question above currently has four down-votes and three up-votes.

Can anyone explain the reason for the former?

It is difficult not to suspect that anything that suggests something that is even a little bit different from conventional practice is considered satanic and treasonous.

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
6
$\begingroup$

I have no idea why folks downvoted. I see a negative comment from one person, so I'd guess that person might have downvoted.

I see that you asked at the question about downvotes. (I'd recommend changing the third word to 'possible'.) I think that's the best place to ask.

I do think that saying why you've downvoted is a courtesy to the author of a question. I hope folks will answer you there.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .